Latest videos by SAMTOMAS

what you think they should do to this stupid boy? poor cat Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 339 seconds stupid boy poor cat animle Related: stupid, boy, and, deserve, to, be, send, life, in, jail Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Another reason ... By: nokithecat. on 08 Dec 11, 05:18:49 Another reason these snakes need to be banned. People can't be responsible and abuse animals. Jail? the kid, maybe one of the other prisoners will make him their pet! i know the video it ... By: SAMTOMAS. on 08 Dec 11, 04:58:46 i know the video it hurt to some viewrs.i feel sorry for the cat..the boy? was arrested and puting in jail and was also fined 20,000 euro. Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA Shooting missile air to air (must see) Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 21 seconds Related: sukhoi, 50, pak, fa, animation, youtube Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: klasssss? By: aslan93329. on 24 May 12, 16:16:19 klasssss? F-22? and T-50 are ... By: TheKrasnaludek. on 08 May 12, 05:35:06 F-22? and T-50 are developed by mostly white people. If whites unite, then nobody can touch the combined power. China still copies Russia, despite China having far more engineers and scientists. Pyotr Ufimtsev was ... By: eloidor. on 20 Apr 12, 10:27:24 Pyotr Ufimtsev was a traitor, he did get funded by the USSR , his work started in the 60's but then was later cancelled and stock due to? the fact that back in the 60's the USSR was really behind on turbine fuel management and their planes were real gas guzzlers, a stealth design like the f-117 (which was the same plane Ufimtsev design for the Soviets only difference was the star on the wingtips was red) would only make it a target drone as demonstrated by colonel Zoltan Dani. F18 crash ... By: blademanx. on 08 Apr 12, 10:54:08 F18 crash embarrasing eh....Civilian? households as well Looks like an f22? ... By: deadmoonz123. on 19 Mar 12, 19:25:17 Looks like an f22? was shot down by T50 wuu huuuup fake? By: aviakurs. on 29 Feb 12, 13:49:19 fake? As long as Russia ... By: calripson. on 29 Feb 12, 00:53:29 As long as Russia can drop a tactical nuke from an Iskander or a strategic nuke from a Topol on the airbase where all those gee whiz F-22s eventually have to land, they don't in the ultimate sense? add up to ****. Wow..where did you ... By: iviciaable. on 28 Feb 12, 09:00:42 Wow..where did you get these classified numbers about S-300 and S-400 !? :)) Eurofighter Typhoon which have mid power PESA radar made a lock on F-22 at more then 40 km in one of the exercises . What about newest Russian AESA radars with double power..not to speak about X 10 power of latest SAM systems. So yes, USA will get? good reason..if they conclude that they are technologically superior to Russia...so we will have to wait better times for USA :) Wow..where did you ... By: iviciaable. on 28 Feb 12, 08:59:52 Wow..where did you get these classified numbers about S-300 and S-400 !? :)) Eurofighter Typhoon which have mid power PESA radar made a lock on F-22 at more then 40 km in one? of the exercises . What about newest Russian AESA radars with double power..not to speak about X 10 power of latest SAM systems. So yes, USA will get good reason..if they conclude that they are technologically superior to Russia...so we will have to wait better times for USA :) Wow..where did you ... By: iviciaable. on 28 Feb 12, 08:59:26 Wow..where did you get these classified numbers about S-300 and S-400 !? :)) Eurofighter Typhoon which have mid power PESA radar made a lock on F-22 at more then 40 km in one of the exercises . What about newest Russian AESA radars with double power..not to speak about X 10? power of latest SAM systems. So yes, USA will get good reason..if they conclude that they are technologically superior to Russia...so we will have to wait better times for USA :) Maybe at extremely ... By: eyeAMtwinkEE. on 24 Feb 12, 04:23:29 Maybe at extremely close ranges. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense the S-300 can't even detect the F-22 until about 24km out, let alone engage the F-22. The S-400, about 98km. Keep in mind most of the? F-22's munitions can be deployed at 3-4x that range, stealth is vital. American hasn't attacked technologically advanced nations because most technologically advanced nations don't provide a good reason to attack them. why are you sorry? ... By: parapobabam. on 24 Feb 12, 03:10:56 why are you sorry? they chose not to develop stealth, knowing that it would be hugely expensive and ultimately a failure. stealth can be detected with 70s radars. there is a reason why america doesn't attack? technologically advanced countries. And later on, when ... By: eyeAMtwinkEE. on 24 Feb 12, 02:58:20 And later on, when Pyotr moved to the states and was confronted with the American fruits of his studies from the 70's, Ufimtsev stated he knew the capabilities, bu the Soviets ignored? him. You still have to credit the US for stealth technology, sorry. ???????? ???????, ... By: alleksart. on 16 Feb 12, 10:40:40 ???????? ???????, ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ????????)) ? ?????? ? ??????????))? ahh i? see thank ... By: gunguy702. on 04 Feb 12, 13:24:18 ahh i? see thank you. You are asking ... By: Iggy82xl. on 02 Feb 12, 23:12:19 You are asking questions that you can answer for yourself by googling PAK-FA images. While most of them are speculations, some of them are very sound, In case you're bored, I can give a gist of it: avionics (as in most planes) are in the neck/cockpit area, one huge fuel tank is in the back part of the neck, between the engine intakes, fuel in other places is all over the plane, in? wings, between engines and weapons bays (PAK-FA has 4 of those btw), etc... then were does the ... By: gunguy702. on 02 Feb 12, 20:10:51 then were does the heavy radio and avionics go?then were does the fuel go?this is not a very? good design.Unless they have created stealth pylons,bombs,and missile.then,in that case,these 5th generation designs are much more deadly than we civilians think. It can cary 4 ... By: Iggy82xl. on 02 Feb 12, 14:05:07 It can cary 4 medium range missiles in the bay between the engine. There is speculation that? the two blisters at the root of the wings are bays for 1 short range missile each. not enough space.my ... By: gunguy702. on 02 Feb 12, 11:00:04 not enough space.my guess is that it can carry 2 missles? in the intakes.so much for weapons. But the news is the ... By: YaHuyeyuNna. on 01 Feb 12, 23:56:14 But the news is the combat suite including missiles for PAKFA is on schedule and will be completed/ready by 2014? It's not? fake it ... By: YaHuyeyuNna. on 01 Feb 12, 23:54:27 It's not? fake it is CGI quite obviously. Russians would not reveal footage like this unless you are Indian DRDO FAAAAKE.? By: luckyStrike89ru. on 01 Feb 12, 23:48:02 FAAAAKE.? Between? the ... By: Iggy82xl. on 01 Feb 12, 23:14:05 Between? the engines? Very nice CG? work! ... By: bujoun76. on 24 Jan 12, 01:14:02 Very nice CG? work! The only "giveaway" was the smoke from the missile. That's about what I ... By: Shadowthedgehog1. on 21 Jan 12, 01:48:51 That's about what I was told by someone I had an argument with earlier - only, he said it was Nazi Germany and not the U.S. Go argue about it with the other "educators" - the Russians, British, Neo-Nazis, the dinosaurs, whoever you want. I'm fine with knowing only what I see (I saw the United States constructing stealth fighters first, while others didn't care for? the idea - that's enough for me) Pak-fa T-50 engine on fire maks airshow 2011 Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 27 seconds pak-fa T-50 on fire Related: pak-fa, t-50, f-22, fire, engine, on Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: This is? surging ... By: Dimaangel1996. on 07 May 12, 17:44:27 This is? surging engine, there's nothing wrong. OHHH FAIL Ah well ... By: dogfight001. on 01 May 12, 22:01:43 OHHH FAIL Ah well WORK IN PROGRESS!? :D a bird can defeat ... By: Tomahawk1999. on 09 Apr 12, 23:54:27 a bird can defeat any plane. it classifies as FOD, foreign object damage. dont be such a snob. theres nothing wrong in having a? preference but its ridiculous to critique something about which you know nothing cooooooool? By: munny0051. on 04 Apr 12, 19:26:11 cooooooool? wow! cool! even ... By: dobrovolets777. on 15 Mar 12, 04:59:51 wow! cool! even speedfires? can destroy PAK FA! oh yeah, I knopw it, one of the real cool military magazine wrote it! And it is true! Who cares what you ... By: dobrovolets777. on 15 Mar 12, 04:52:27 Who cares what you think? nobody...u? r just another troll who knows nothing about aviation. So russian planes ... By: HerculesRockefellerr. on 15 Mar 12, 04:33:42 So russian planes have bird defense...haha. I think the real reason this happened is the plane is really a peice of junk!? the new ... By: dobrovolets777. on 15 Mar 12, 03:24:14 the new information? about this incident - malfunction in system of fuel supply...but anyway - yes, if bird fly into the engine it can damage it...but there is a defence against such incidents on all russian fighters...my info about the bird was wrong. So a bird? can ... By: HerculesRockefellerr. on 14 Mar 12, 17:30:52 So a bird? can defeat the Pak Fa? The Mi-28 prototype ... By: 52111centrumcz. on 15 Feb 12, 23:45:36 The Mi-28 prototype came out 1977. The AH-64 was out in 1975. If you think it takes two years to copy some design, then you're nuts. Development of a helicopter from scratch (MI-28) started in 1972. Five years is a minimum if starting from? a clean sheet. The US still has to field a high AoA, lifting body mid-wing fighter with very long range. (Su-27). In tanks, US ... By: 52111centrumcz. on 15 Feb 12, 23:35:10 In tanks, US companies caught up with soviet tanks in the 1980s with the deployment of the M1. They surpassed them in? the 1990s with M1HA and M1A1. In rocket engines, the US is 15 years behind. In electronics, its 10 years ahead. In unification of weapon industrial complex, its 30 years behind. Except unlike ... By: 52111centrumcz. on 15 Feb 12, 23:32:22 Except unlike americans they don't develop all new systems from scratch and use old soviet era OBOGs from the Mig-31 because they work just fine and dandy...as the price per unit is then much? cheaper, unlike the US approach where the warfare socialist state keeps pampering the weapons corporations by overpaying for stuff they ought to produce at quality for the last 20 years, yet they aren't capable of doing well. it is junk NATO ... By: CROYHILL. on 29 Jan 12, 17:37:00 it is junk NATO would prob destroy russian air force on the ground but if one of these got in the air an f22 would destroy? it & a eurofighter would light it up & smoke it wow...how the ... By: dobrovolets777. on 22 Jan 12, 03:49:20 wow...how the american military stinkies are glad here? unfortunetely for crazy american boyscouts - it was just pompage...did you ever see how the bird flies intothe turbine? no? :)))? I sure i read as ... By: steve7dr4. on 10 Jan 12, 20:03:41 I sure i read as this was in early stage of development that the engine it will? actually end using had not being fitted yet? That wives-tale has ... By: r1cw. on 02 Jan 12, 16:02:57 That wives-tale has been? floating around since long before Sept 2011. If you have a link to a valid article or anything concrete I would love to see it. And the cheesy blogs by "unnamed" sources and second hand accounts don't count as valid. Don't worry it's ... By: Veldtian1. on 31 Dec 11, 08:42:26 Don't worry it's just a fuel nozzle burping too much mix into the combustion chamber, just needs a tune-up that's all.. This baby will be back? raping the skies in a few days. In a join exercise ... By: 1littlelee. on 30 Dec 11, 20:00:03 In a join exercise between the UK and US in September 2011 the euro-fighter went up? against the F22 in aerial combat Manoeuvres,In 22 Missions in total(I NEVER ONCE said in war) and the euro-fighter shot down (electronically) 6 F22's, to the F22 shooting down 1 Euro-fighter, also the Euro-fighter completed 15 Missions successfully to the F22 completed 6 Missions successfully, You can think what you want about these stats, but they have been proven and are for public release! stop regurgitating ... By: r1cw. on 26 Dec 11, 03:47:27 stop regurgitating that urban legend. The Euro Fighter never shot? down ANY F-22's ever. you can say what ... By: 1littlelee. on 24 Dec 11, 07:31:04 you can say what you want the facts are there euro fighter 6 - F22 1, the facts are avaliable for all to see, so I have to say F22 sucks, the eurofighter also shot the? F22 down with RADAR guided missiles. Yes and if? the ... By: ESC8781. on 23 Dec 11, 02:37:01 Yes and if? the russian aircrafts are going to be stealthy they have to go through the same shit the f-22 have to go through that includes Maintenance and oxygen systems even the cost. it just shows what ... By: 5xthejoy. on 18 Dec 11, 11:02:44 it just shows what a dummy you are and? people won't take you seriously. If you don't know how to spell what chances do you have of knowing anything about fighter jets. F-22 is KING. GO USAF. lollies i dnt giv a ... By: 1littlelee. on 18 Dec 11, 09:29:18 lollies i dnt giv a fuk if ma speliing anoys u!? befor? take? off! By: videohost199. on 17 Dec 11, 18:56:44 befor? take? off! Its called ... By: igor7702. on 14 Dec 11, 13:49:09 Its called THRUUUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSST.? F-15 Shot down in libya Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 80 seconds F-15 shot down libya not in iraq Related: f-15, f-22, shot, down, libya, war, usa, russia, iraq, nato Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Yea? actually By: SubZero1703. on 15 Feb 12, 08:22:19 Yea? actually no, I'd much rather ... By: DREwestcoast. on 21 Dec 11, 20:06:57 no, I'd much rather have my? head softened by watching US mainstream news... lol, it's ... By: lilruc. on 31 Aug 11, 02:04:54 lol, it's russiatoday; what did you expect, honesty?? It was mechanic ... By: JVC7400. on 07 Jul 11, 10:44:28 It was mechanic failure, if it was shot down do you then think the entire aircraft will be lying on ground in one? single piece? Please? try and ... By: international152. on 22 Apr 11, 21:27:05 Please? try and report honestly? Clearly a catastrophic malfunction Russkie!! Chaldeans Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 85 seconds short clip about chaldeans civilization Related: chaldea, chaldeans, iraq Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: ty bro..god? bless ... By: SAMTOMAS. on 17 Mar 11, 04:35:44 ty bro..god? bless you too basma gyanoukh ... By: Alqoshi. on 16 Mar 11, 07:52:51 basma gyanoukh akhoni great work im very proud of you keep it up one love to our Chaldean? Nation hahahahaha Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 26 seconds russian car Related: comedy, fun, awsome Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: hahahahaha? By: KristoSiniallik. on 23 Mar 11, 19:43:42 hahahahaha? hahahahaha? By: KristoSiniallik. on 23 Mar 11, 19:43:37 hahahahaha? hahahahaha? By: KristoSiniallik. on 23 Mar 11, 19:43:32 hahahahaha? hahahahaha? By: KristoSiniallik. on 23 Mar 11, 19:43:28 hahahahaha? not funny at all? > ... By: abdallavwvw50. on 14 Mar 11, 01:51:33 not funny at all? >?! haha,? nice! By: SpeedingHummer. on 08 Mar 11, 22:51:05 haha,? nice! hahahaha awsome trick Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 55 seconds Related: hahahahaha Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: S-400 Triumf destroys supersonic target Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 74 seconds S-400 Related: s-400, s-300, f-22, f-15, su-35, pak-fa Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: New Russian armored car must see Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 92 seconds Related: russian, car, army, f-22, f-15, f-16, su-27, su-35, pak, fa Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: USA watch out CHINA New stealth Fighter J-20 and more Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 151 seconds China showing its new Stealth fighter Related: j-20, f-22, pak-fa, f-15, f-16, su-27, su-37, su33, su-35 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: go to global fire ... By: gman20031. on 18 Aug 11, 04:10:05 go to global fire power.com all one word no spaces and see where? china ranks So the U.S and ... By: 455200930. on 04 Aug 11, 00:49:14 So the U.S and Russian security guys are idiots? And anyone can just come and take the plans for your military weapons and other stuff? Man that must be scary...? :) China is a? failed ... By: EthanD1997. on 01 Jul 11, 20:07:44 China is a? failed country Drop dead you ... By: tonygogap. on 09 Jun 11, 22:23:29 Drop dead you stupid chink, if you think you are going to take over the united states then your dreaming too much. China? steals and copies technology from Russia and U.S. all the time, you fags are a bunch of wanna be super powers. cry more? By: ervin920. on 09 Jun 11, 15:20:26 cry more? The Chinese like to ... By: tonygogap. on 30 May 11, 23:03:19 The Chinese like to steal? technology from USA. ???????? ???? ????? ... By: MrSLAVA39. on 21 May 11, 03:37:51 ???????? ???? ????? 100% ????????? ?????????? ! ?????????????? ?????????))) ????? if anyone thinks ... By: 420Mike713. on 20 Apr 11, 14:56:29 if anyone thinks what the U.S. has is bullshit, then what does the rest of the world have? dumbass? all the us has is ... By: plutone220696. on 19 Apr 11, 15:35:26 all the us has is bullshit all they have that is a bit good that is not? cold war era is the new lasers and railgun tests ??????????: === ( ... By: ohmyholymothergod. on 17 Apr 11, 00:39:05 ??????????: === (The Mass) watch?v=t-WnjVUBDbs === (????) watch?v=SjyGLi6KnqQ === (??????Das? Panzerlied) watch?v=jEIm3pe5wbA === ????????? By: wowwowwolf. on 14 Apr 11, 03:16:26 ????????? Jeremiah 17:23 Yet ... By: ShannonCole888. on 21 Feb 11, 18:02:31 Jeremiah 17:23 Yet they did not listen or pay attention; they were stiff-necked and would not listen or respond to discipline. God will judge America.. ? Habakkuk 2:7Shall ... By: ShannonCole888. on 21 Feb 11, 18:01:40 Habakkuk 2:7Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that shall vex thee, and thou shalt be for booties unto them? translation: Will not your debtors suddenly arise? Will they not wake up and make you? tremble? Then you will become their victim. Listen to this proverb written in the Holy Bible, by the wisest of men.. "He, that being often reproved hardeneth [his] neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy." Here is? something ... By: ShannonCole888. on 21 Feb 11, 17:57:10 Here is? something America may want to consider from the hand of God. Let me ask you a simple question ? Did the wicked escape the flood in Noah's day ? What about Sodom ? Egypt ? What about Babylon, Mede's Persia ? Did the Jews escape God's wrath for rejecting Jesus Christ ? No, they were destroyed as a Nation, they were scattered throughout the world, they were almost completely exterminated during the Holocaust, they never see peace ? Do people honestly think America will escape judgement ? yes we have the J- ... By: jake9179. on 21 Feb 11, 06:57:56 yes we have the J-20 and quite a few other stealth jets (perhaps Bombers too) and chopper(s) (example WZ-10)in the work but let's not get too carry away here, as much as i love to say yea we are the best...yay China, but the US already have the F-22 in service yea their F-35 is crap and waste of money but the J-20 will have to wait a few more years before it actually enter the PLA, with that said im? cautiously optimistic about the J-20 and other projects. the only problem is ... By: 420Mike713. on 16 Feb 11, 13:42:06 the only problem is what the? U.S. has that no one even knows about yet F-22 Raptor Can't Do what Su-37 Do Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 134 seconds Amazing Jet Fighter Related: f-22, su-37, su-27, f-15, f-16, f-117, jet, fighters, russia, usa, eu-fighter Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: technology> ... By: HCUS3. on 12 Feb 12, 10:14:39 technology>maneuverability ? Even in the video ... By: TheTequilaShooter. on 17 Dec 11, 03:06:17 Even in the video that you provided the English pilot says the cobra is too predicatable and an easy? kill. The maneuvers in this vid are uselss in combat. They bleed the energy of the aircraft, which makes them a sitting duck. No where in this vid do you see the important features of dogffighting - its bleed recovery, or its instantaneus or sustained turn rates. If this is what you like than watch a crop-duster. "i can not find any ... By: TheTequilaShooter. on 17 Dec 11, 03:01:51 "i can not find any thing on limited avionics on su 37? " The only Russian performers that are combat ready are the Russian Knights. You can even find vids of the Mig 35 performing similar maneuvers as the Su 37 here, but guess what, in the MMRCA competition the Mig came in dead last. It failed? at what matters most- bleed recovery and sustained and instantaneous turn rates. The F-16 was much more maneuverable, let alone the F-22 I watched your vid ... By: TheTequilaShooter. on 17 Dec 11, 02:49:11 I watched your vid and I that's nothing new. What's your point? The F-22 does fly with a full belly. I've read it in a pdf file that describes the details of what each aircraft performs in an airshow, and it includes a specification that it flies w/ 18K lbs of fuel.. "he fails to mention pilots hrs in? other planes" - Google: "U.S. Air Force said the rookie pilots F-22 is easier to master flying techniques" yes they have ... By: Carpet64tv. on 17 Dec 11, 00:12:09 yes they have removed the stores thus means can be fitted out again. i? can not find any thing on limited avionics on su 37? was not going to be a real dogfight watch?v=rCsowvSIxMo&feature=related as for limited fuel well i believe any aircraft fly's lite on fuel during a display. f22 pilot rookie what did you listen to the vid he says 100hrs in f22 (he fails to mention pilots hrs in other planes) against pilots with 3000hrs in aircraft so that pilot would not be a rookie LOL LOL That was not a ... By: TheTequilaShooter. on 14 Dec 11, 02:41:07 LOL That was not a real dogfight. That would have been between 2 exhibition planes which would have proved nothing. Fact is the Su-37 you see in airshows is NOT combat ready, it flies with limited avionics, no stores, &? a limited amount of fuel. This is unlike the F-22, which is a combat ready aircraft flying with a full load of 18000 lbs of fuel, & can perform the same with a full weapons load. Yes the F-22 pilot is a rookie. See "F-22 undefeated at Al Dhafra" LOL Look mate 1996 ... By: Carpet64tv. on 14 Dec 11, 00:11:35 Look mate 1996 farnborough the Russians threw down a challenge to any western pilot any western plane for a reel dogfight against the su 37 but no one accepted. The su 37 is just a normal su 27? with up rated engines 2D TVC and the addition of canards a new glass cockpit(the videos I have seen state new radar) so yes it would seem to me that with little additions to su 37 it would be easily made combat ready you say a guy with 1 years experience flys at airshows no way ($200 mill & beginer) Sorry, but this is ... By: TheTequilaShooter. on 26 Oct 11, 15:34:17 Sorry, but this is a joke. The Su-37 in this video is a showbird only and is not combat ready. The only Russian air demo team that flies combat ready aricraft are the? Russian Knights, and their maneuvers pale in comparision to the F-22's. The Su you see in this video has limited avionics, no external stores (reduced drag), and is flown by a very experienced pilot. The F-22's you see are combat ready, and often flown by guys who have been behind the stick for less than a year. F-22 Killer Russian PAK-FA T-50 ''must see'' Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 212 seconds First russia stealth jet fighter meant to see F-22 first and kill it Related: pak-fa, t-50, f-22, stealth Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Youtube is full of ... By: lhx1502. on 24 May 12, 20:53:41 Youtube is full of military and? avionics experts. Why do Chinese and? ... By: akear. on 23 May 12, 15:19:14 Why do Chinese and? Russian jets all look like either the F-15 or F-22. The new Stealth F-15 will be competitive with anything out there. nothing in common ... By: sharpiellll. on 23 May 12, 13:33:38 nothing in common with the F-22, but B2 bomber is a ripoff? of the nazi stealth bomber What a amazing ... By: akear. on 23 May 12, 02:16:04 What a amazing ripoff of the? F-22. It also looks big and clumsy. ????????? ??????... By: 8693max. on 22 May 12, 00:15:02 ????????? ??????... I was refering to ... By: laetrille. on 16 May 12, 01:37:42 I was refering to conventional war w/o nukes. Well war is stupid especially if you invade like the US has done in Iraq an is planning to do in Iran. The only reason a country should wage war is during invasion of sovreign soil. In reality even if Russia and China joined forces their combined force would only be 1/3 that of the US according to Defence Talk and World Millitary Power. Yet even this does not matter because in case? of war both parties would end up as burnt sausages. So no one wins. Ok, wiping out ... By: DaSnipy. on 15 May 12, 21:40:43 Ok, wiping out china in matter of months SERIOUSLY seems like over threat. They may not be as weak in 21st century as world feels. Russia is another bear not? to be poked too .. who knows if they will suddenly be game to support china.. what then ? Yeah, but even if ... By: laetrille. on 15 May 12, 21:22:13 Yeah, but even if China decided to collect they would lose all those outsourced jobs and their millitary would be wiped out in a matter of months. The only reason the US can be reckless with money. I do agree with you though and I? know we have to be more fiscaly responsibe. On the flip side we have to keep a strong defence, no nation the size of the US can survive without millitary supremacy. It sounds too ... By: DaSnipy. on 14 May 12, 22:59:05 It sounds too expensive a deal. Already 15 trillion debt. Bill wont? pass. The same way we ... By: laetrille. on 14 May 12, 21:09:31 The same way we paid for the 600+ F-15s. Or we can sell obselete millitary hardware, which there are many countries wanting to buy. The millitary? budget can cover about half. HAHA. Nothing is ... By: nimaside. on 12 May 12, 22:43:34 HAHA. Nothing is going to bring down the f-22 raptor. The way a Raptor will get? killed is if the Raptor pilot kills it cause he can't breath haha. Who? is paying for ... By: DaSnipy. on 12 May 12, 15:57:52 Who? is paying for 600 F-22 ? China ? ?? ??????? ... By: 7KENTEK. on 12 May 12, 08:10:18 ?? ??????? ?????????? ??? ??????? ?? ?????? ??? ???-?? ????? ??? ??????????? ????????? ??? ????? ???????? ?? 2013 ???????? ?? ?????????? ? 2015 ???????? ???????? ????????????! I don't understand ... By: msalak87. on 12 May 12, 02:49:53 I don't understand how the PAK-FA can be compared to the Raptor when we have no idea of the Raptors true capabilities? What big companies are we believing? The US military had people overseeing the entire F-22 program and even specifying the criteria for the jet. They? tell the public what they must but no more in the name of opsec. Most of the people commenting here are basing their facts in some strange fantasy world. MY educated OPINION is we will never see an F-22 lost to the PAK-FA does the pak-fa ... By: lalle567. on 11 May 12, 20:01:32 does the pak-fa really bring? a kind of trinity-bomb from ACAH, or is it just a big lie. Possibly but we , ... By: MrDynamitd. on 11 May 12, 18:26:39 Possibly but we ,here in canada try not to get brainwashed by corporate and pentagon propaganda , ( which is far better than soviet hype at their best)and why are other countries re-evaluating their fighter purchase commitments from the U.S.surly it would could not because of the brilliant design and performance of the jets themselves ????,OH must be political,,,,,ive been around too long to believe everything i see and half? of what I hear,,,20 years down the road will tell the story Typical? Canadian. By: akngac5. on 09 May 12, 15:41:55 Typical? Canadian. And you base your ... By: akngac5. on 09 May 12, 15:39:46 And you base your claims off what, conjecture and speculation? I love how people assume this and that with nothing to back it up with. But hey, it is your opinion, who am I? to point out your claims. All of you who talk ... By: laetrille. on 08 May 12, 23:38:11 All of you who talk shit about the f-22 & f-35 are morons. The pak-fa and the su-47 are not even active millitarily, there are only 4 prototypes of the pak-fa and su-47 also has only 4 prototypes & is far behind in? development and production than the pak-fa. The su-47 wont be available for another 10 years and wont be fully combat ready till 2025. The same situation goes for the pak, but it will be operational sooner. The russians will only be able to operate 115 of each. 600 f-22s are planned. Not until the late ... By: thurlow92. on 08 May 12, 00:48:24 Not until the late 2016. It doesn't matter how they build it. The plane will be ineffective against the F/A-22 Raptor for many reasons. For now I'm just? gonna throw one out there to keep this debate going. Those two large engines that will reduce the stealth SIGNIFICANTLY! RUSSIAN? WINS!!!!!! ... By: AntonSmol67. on 07 May 12, 12:26:22 RUSSIAN? WINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? deliveries were not ... By: MrDynamitd. on 07 May 12, 02:03:59 deliveries were not to start until 2015 but production has not been hampered with? problems like american development,,,,build it rough and build it tough seems to be their motto,,,american seems to be how much budget overruns can we squeeze out of the pentagon before some defence comittee hollers,,,, India plans on 200 ... By: MrDynamitd. on 07 May 12, 01:59:30 India plans on 200 units up until? the Dassault deal last week,,,, number of planes may now be changed,,, both T-50 and F-22 ... By: Mandrak789. on 06 May 12, 08:45:01 both T-50 and F-22 are too expensive and? delicate machines, I dont think US nor Russia will really be able to support them for long Judging by specs ... By: furis32. on 06 May 12, 06:53:34 Judging by specs alone it's inferior only in radar cross-section, which may decrease in the production model. Anyway, russia is producing a thousand of them, whereas there are only about 200 of? F-22's. SU-35 Radar System awsome must see Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 74 seconds SU-35 Radar System Targets Acquisition Range Radar Coverage Areas. Related: super, jet, fighter, russian, military, army, air, forces, sukhoi, okb, combat, radar, system Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: yeap ! its ... By: DaSnipy. on 22 May 12, 12:27:48 yeap ! its vulnerable? to low frequency. =D ... can you ... By: boobtuber06. on 31 Mar 12, 13:46:16 ... can you honestly say that you guys can? track and kill an F-22 at a tactical range???? i like the music? By: boobtuber06. on 31 Mar 12, 13:45:22 i like the music? Where did you get ... By: doctorwhodidapoo. on 19 Mar 12, 18:53:42 Where did you get your facts from its a? know fact the astute class submarine is the most advance submarine in the world Lucky? bastards you ... By: RiccardoTheBeAst. on 13 Mar 12, 14:38:08 Lucky? bastards you already have the beautyful Su-30MKI =P LONG LIVE? RUSSIA ... By: abhijithero. on 07 Mar 12, 08:53:26 LONG LIVE? RUSSIA FROM INDIA. Topol-M for subs? ... By: Viruner. on 06 Mar 12, 10:31:31 Topol-M for subs? Are u mad? Borei will use "Bulava". Also the most modern russian ballistic missile is "Yars".? Russian 6th ... By: Zbyszkoz. on 02 Mar 12, 02:12:15 Russian 6th generation laser ( radar) can tract from 500-1000 km + 1cm2? !! Russia also have ... By: Vann7. on 25 Feb 12, 23:34:47 Russia also have the best and most modern Attack and? Ballistic Submarines in the world. Their next generation Yansen and Borei class released recently..much better than anything NATO and US have that already have decades in service. Topol-M missiles are beyond anything the west have. Borei subs were made exclusively for those missiles. :) who cares who's ... By: keiweak. on 24 Feb 12, 02:08:38 who cares who's better on what.cuz in the end all of this tech is useless when WW3 starts cuz we all knew its not a war in which we fight on conventional but by nuclear weps.and why bragging about your? tech if you dont used it on actual combat??what are you trying to give it to the chins or iran any other shithole of a country. nice fantasy ... By: 6308281. on 19 Feb 12, 16:21:13 nice fantasy anyways? The american APG-77 ... By: TankNutJohn89. on 10 Feb 12, 23:38:43 The american APG-77 can track a 1m² target at 240km, this one can track a 3m² target at 400km,? what is better now huh? Shaam2023, yip, i ... By: primatepercussionist. on 03 Feb 12, 09:29:39 Shaam2023, yip, i hope it doesnt work. Sadly i live in a country that doesnt have full? power of its government. (yet) ?????????? ... By: HEBOJIbHUK. on 22 Jan 12, 13:16:21 ?????????? ??????????????? ?????? ???????, ?????? ?????? ??????? ????? ??????? ??????? ?????????? there is a direct ... By: MrFattyfatfatboy. on 19 Jan 12, 02:11:23 there is a direct corelation between thre prowess of a country in tech in the public market place and what the military can lay their hands on, and russia has nothing when it comes building advanced chips or hardware(they? are however brilliant programers and accidently invented stealth)also look how american aircraft in the two gulf wars biggest threat was not soviet hardware but themselves. Plus i dont see the ... By: normison69. on 18 Jan 12, 18:15:32 Plus i dont see the relativity of laptops to this issue,? Russia has same PCs like USA does. Everyone in the world has, but they dont just use Mac or Crapple products. Wich are toys not serious electronincs. Russia has best ICBM its called Topol-M ask any NATO expert and Russia has best anti-air system S-400 wich is 20 years ahead of anything USA has, ask again any NATO expert. (that requires good radar tech). Erm keep living in ... By: normison69. on 18 Jan 12, 18:10:59 Erm keep living in your dreams, Russia has the best ground and air radars at the moment. Like the new MiG-35s radar that not just acts as normal radar but it also scans the horizon with very high zoom camera and laser. So things far away that pilot does not see like "stealth aircraft" will be visible to him and the Stealth? pilot wont even know it. Keep living in your fantasy world that USA is ahead in everything Russia has, just after Obama made huge military cuts especially. go talk to some of ... By: MrFattyfatfatboy. on 18 Jan 12, 14:34:14 go talk to some of your airforce technitions on who has what in tech, the Americans are? 20 to 30 years ahead in synthetic radar and phased array, or tell you what go out and buy a russian laptop computer and compare it an american one, let me know if you even find one,this translates to weapons as well, go to one of your techparks and ask them about US computers and do they have any russian ones, this means russia no support in the market place in tech and thiers a reason This video is? ... By: normison69. on 18 Jan 12, 13:57:24 This video is? probably not made by Sukhoi company so its some fan showing off the radar and India is Russias largest weapons systems buyer. F-18 is old shit compared to SU-35. Its worse even than SU-27M. F18 does not have ... By: normison69. on 18 Jan 12, 13:55:07 F18 does not have better radar, F18 vs SU-35 is a? joke matchup. In wich SU-35 wins 90% of time hands down. ???????? ???? ... By: SUSHEF1980. on 17 Jan 12, 04:01:40 ???????? ???? ?????? ? ??? ???, ?? ?? ???????? ????? ???????? ? ???? ??????, ? ??????? ??? ????, ?? ???? ?????????? ????????, ?????? ??? ????? ????! ????? ?????? !!! MAIN POWER? RUSSIA is that, WE ARE THE MOST NEWSET not to? buy WEAPON IN THE WORLD, AND CREATE ITS OWN, and as experience shows, do a better job of all! THE GLORY OF RUSSIA! why didnt india buy ... By: MrFattyfatfatboy. on 02 Jan 12, 00:34:31 why didnt india buy the f18f better radar and tech ,and then you can fly them from carriers as? well, also like the drumming . ??????? By: Shmacktop. on 19 Dec 11, 07:01:17 ??????? "Bigger radar to ... By: krbosak. on 16 Dec 11, 15:20:49 "Bigger radar to pick up enemy fighters way B4 they pick it? up" Of course you know nothing about passive detection ranges of active radars. Even wikipedia would help you much, as well as most basic electrodynamics course in any university. It may have a good ... By: RusPindos. on 07 Dec 11, 00:07:21 It may have a good radar, but these marketing materials are like from 80's. Discolored, hardly readable, static diagrams, with some trance-inducing? Asian music. Cold War pic's su-37 f-16 mig-27 mig-25 FA-18 mig-29 must se Posted by: SAMTOMAS Video duration: 234 seconds pic's from cold war jet fighters tu-95 su-37 mig-29 FA-18 f-16 f-15 Related: f-15, fa18, su-37, tu-95, f-14, mig-29, mig-25, f-16 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: i did? not know how ... By: SAMTOMAS. on 06 Apr 12, 03:19:48 i did? not know how to be honest. Why didn't you put ... By: gtamodman122. on 05 Apr 12, 20:51:33 Why didn't you put a Cold War era? song instead of this rap/hip-hop/whatever thing? The Aircraft at 0: ... By: JVC7400. on 07 Jul 11, 10:55:48 The Aircraft at 0:55 is a Blackburn Buccaneer. I? Bet you ALL missed that one... :-) Ok, this has GOT to ... By: BobbyB654321. on 03 Apr 11, 16:39:58 Ok, this has GOT to be partially faked. A Tu-95 Bear flying low altitude over a USN Aircraft Carrier? No side would be stupid enough to do that. One wrong move and you've got? a full standoff involving nukes. And at 3:34- An A-6 escorting a Tu-95? A-6's were ground attack planes! Additionally, it would have been very unlikely for the F/A-18 to intercept a bomber because it was relatively new. The F-14 was much better for ACM at the time. Must have been photoshopped. at 1:51 its a f-104? By: grktu. on 27 Dec 10, 10:57:54 at 1:51 its a f-104? @lagendarock92 ... By: SukhoiSu47. on 12 Dec 10, 17:38:50 @lagendarock92 What you're missing: MiG-23,? Tu-95, F-18, Su-30, Panavia Todrando? at 0:36 + 2:10, Tu-22, Jas-39? at 1:21, F-5, MiG-25, Tu-16? @ 2:30, Su-37? @ 2:51, Mirage 2000, A-6, MiG-21, plus a few I can't remember :P sucks balls man ... ... By: bennytroutfarmer. on 27 Jun 10, 10:20:59 sucks balls man ... hardin the fuck? up why did you show a ... By: alex080297. on 12 Jun 10, 15:22:36 why did you show a jas-37?? 1:51 is the F-104 ... By: bluecollarcanuck. on 16 May 10, 01:31:49 1:51 is the F-104 Starfighter w/ AWACS variant? of the "Bear". 1.51 f 104 ... By: bomberhayley. on 18 Apr 10, 18:30:08 1.51 f 104 starfighter? ....and there ... By: IntenseWidgets. on 24 Jan 10, 07:57:24 ....and there aren't any A/C-130s in this video. The C-130 Hercules you see (3:49) is the standard variety. Spooky/Spectre has 105MM Howitzers, 40MM cannon, and 25MM Gatlin or Bushmaster sticking out of the sides. But, the dead giveaway for an A/C-130 are the Strik Radar located inside the? aircraft's nose, an infrared detection set (IDS) seen just behind the nose and? the ALL-TV sensor located below and to the right of the 25mm Gatling gun. This aircraft has none of that. - Well, you missed ... By: IntenseWidgets. on 24 Jan 10, 07:45:10 Well, you missed these allied fighter jets: Blackburn 2.2B Buccaneer (00:55) Mirage 2000 (1:21) F-5 Tiger (1:45) (Can't tell at 1:51) GR-1 Tornados (2:10) F-20 Tigershark (2:42) A-4A Skyhawk (2:55 - behind? the Su) A-4M Skyhawk (3:17) A-6 Intruder (3:31) Lightening F-3 (3:41) ...and your "F-18 Super Hornets" were actually an F/A-18A with rounded intakes and single seats vs. the Super Hornet's squared intakes and twin seats. _ yeah...but the AC- ... By: lagendarock92. on 08 Dec 09, 09:49:06 yeah...but the AC-130 spectre is still in operation.... i? like the most this air to ground fire support aircraft...its is very useful but if we on it its quite uncomfortable as its flew at above 30000ft... the AC130 was used ... By: JVC7400. on 07 Dec 09, 15:12:02 the AC130 was used in vietnam,? so i would guess that was a cold war aircraft what are the few ... By: lagendarock92. on 07 Dec 09, 08:34:33 what are the few dude?? give? me a name... thx... well. you right ... By: SAMTOMAS. on 06 Dec 09, 17:52:10 well. you right but? your only missing few i spotted a F-14,F- ... By: lagendarock92. on 06 Dec 09, 13:54:04 i spotted a F-14,F-15,F-16 the superhornet,AC-130 spectre/spooky,the F4 phantom,B-52 bombers,migs? 29/n....correct me if i miss anything dude.......thx... i spotted a AC-130 ... By: lagendarock92. on 06 Dec 09, 13:50:59 i spotted a AC-130 spectre in? the first 10 second...did u?? cold war pic? the ... By: JVC7400. on 21 Nov 09, 00:06:09 cold war pic? the SU 37 is? a technology demonstrtot aircraft and havent been used in combat The best thing ... By: clbou812. on 14 Nov 09, 08:01:36 The best thing about the Su-37 in my opinion is, that it produced upgrades in the Su-27. This allowed the Su-35, Su-30 MKI, Su-47 (concept) and T-50 (stolen from the raptor) to move forward. The Su-35 and the Su-30 are cheaper to upgrade from Su-27 parts, than to start building the Su-37/ Su-47 in mass. The rest of the world can fear the future of Gen. 4 aircraft from Russia.? All of this is cool ... By: clbou812. on 14 Nov 09, 07:51:45 All of this is cool technology. None of it how ever is 5th generation. In close combat the ability to see you opponent and engage or dis-engage is a critical.? mouzata, The Su-37 ... By: clbou812. on 14 Nov 09, 07:47:52 mouzata, The Su-37 is not a production aircraft. It's a testing platform. Fly by wire, 12 to14 hard points(modified), MFD upgrades, all-weather multi-mode passive electronically scanned array radar with synthetic aperture, terrain avoidance, terrain mapping and a rear-facing radar. Lyulka AL-37FU turbofans with 3D TVC up to 15 degrees, HOTAS, system and the first with side-stick (to brace the pilots hands) and the seat? is reclined 30 degrees to help with stand G forces on the pilot. Russian? aircraft ... By: FreeRaper. on 08 Nov 09, 02:38:33 Russian? aircraft the best! Well F15never lost ... By: mouzata. on 21 Oct 09, 12:13:29 Well F15never lost a combat because they never faced really experienced enemy...?   You like it? Share it! Social Bookmarking

ECVHS videos :: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Feedback powered by: Customer Feedback